This is a platform to comment on local, state and national politics and political news. A special area of interest is the role of corporate media in politics as we move closer and closer to one huge corporation owning all of the media outlets in the country and stifling all independent and critical voices. It will also focus on the absurd 30-plus year Nixonesque political strategy of the “liberal media” lie. This blog is on temporary hiatus because of my job and thin-skinned Republicans.
May 20, 2007
Rogers uses threat MO to attack respected colleague
It appears Rep. Mike Rogers is the latest weapon in the GOP’s quest to discredit U.S. Rep John Murtha, D-PA.
The Associated Press is reporting that during a series of House votes Thursday, Murtha walked to the GOP side to confront Rogers, a former FBI agent. This month, Rogers had tried unsuccessfully to strike from an intelligence spending bill an item that would restore $23 million for the National Drug Intelligence Center, a facility in Murtha's Pennsylvania district.
According to Rogers' account, which Murtha did not dispute, the Democrat angrily told Rogers he should never seek earmarks of his own because "you're not going to get any, now or forever."
"This was clearly designed to try to intimidate me," Rogers told The Associated Press on Friday. "He said it loud enough for other people to hear."
If anyone can tell me what funding Rogers has brought back to the 8th Congressional District I would sure like to hear it. Rogers appears to be fitting into his role as the minority quite well, and after being a cheerleader for Bush’s ill-conceived Iraq fiasco, he now appears to be serving it in a new role as the attack dog.
Rogers said he planned to file a "privileged resolution" Monday that would seek a House vote on whether to reprimand Murtha.
Rogers also claims Murtha made the alleged threat in front of a lot of people, and they are all, of course, Republicans. However, as of Sunday no one has come forward to back up Rogers’ yard.
Murtha, a harsh critic of Bush’s botched Iraq policy, has long been a target of the Republicans. During the last election season an offshoot of the Smear Boat Vets for “truth” that smeared every veteran who ever earned a medal, citation or commendation in their quest to get Sen. John Kerry formed something called “boot Murtha.” It operates just like the smear vets, and it smears all veterans, a tactic taken by the Bush Administration that pays mere lip service to their “support the troops” mantra.
Murtha is a Vietnam combat veteran, and apparently they don’t like that Murtha won two Purple Hearts. Murtha is also a retired Marine Colonel.
This is not a new tactic for Rogers. A few years back, around 2002, the Rogers camp claimed a former staffer named Bill Nowling - who was working for a political consulting group called Persuasion, Inc at the time that was representing a large telecommunications, At & T, I believe- tried to blackmail Rogers. The Rogers people claim Nowling said if Rogers didn’t vote for a telecommunications bill the group’s client wanted passed there would be hundreds of the company’s employees picketing in his office the next day. Now, Nowling claims it never happened, but the Rogers people sure made a big deal out of it at the time. I am still looking for the article that ran in the Livingston County Daily Press & Argus.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Considering glory hound Jack Murtha's history as part of the ABSCAM corruption, I certainly wouldn't put the the threat past him. Mike wouldn't kiss his ring, and Mr. Abscam didn't like it.
But I'll give Murtha credit for one thing. He does bring home the pork right along with Ted Stevens.
You are so correct: Jack Murtha is a glory hound, and that’s why he is a decorated combat vet. Winning the Bronze Star with Combat "V", two Purple Hearts and the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry is sure going for the glory. Funny, Republicans give us this BS about supporting the troops, but few ever serve, and they always seem to attack the service of those Democrats that do serve. Is that what supporting the troops means to you and your party? I’ll pass then.
I don’t know much about this alleged scam, but I don’t recall him ever being convicted or quitting in disgrace like Cunningham, Nay and Foley and the rest of the moral Republicans. This is something Rogers has done in the past to get attention, and for proof see your buddy Bill Nowling’s blog.
As for pork; Isn’t that what we send people to Washington for? Don’t we send them to represent us and better the area? Do bad Rogers doesn't do his job very well. As for pork; it seems to me that the item in question helps better the country, but whom does a bridge to nowhere benefit.
Post a Comment