tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post5260712344510739981..comments2023-11-03T08:09:15.690-05:00Comments on The Conservative Media: Fox ‘news’ rolls out another false warCommunications guruhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-38876936081249485702009-11-10T21:05:41.323-05:002009-11-10T21:05:41.323-05:00Tag team? Like Guru said if you want to repeat rig...Tag team? Like Guru said if you want to repeat right wing talking points without any challenge there's plenty of right wing blogs in Michigan you can comment on.<br /><br />You confused catching you telling a lie as double team, you made an claim and I just pointed out you left out a important part from your source when you tried to discredit Ms.Maddow regarding Bush and the Times..<br /><br Motor City Liberal Returnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05316739270707220559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-65921941218644360642009-11-10T19:12:14.121-05:002009-11-10T19:12:14.121-05:00Not a tag team at all. When you lie, anonymous, yo...Not a tag team at all. When you lie, anonymous, you will be called out on it. I can’t control who else calls you pout. If that bothers you, don’t comment here. Go to a rightwing blog where they do not allow people who disagree with them to post. I’m certainly a better writer than you, anonymous, but that’s not saying much. This administration does not need anyone to make excuses for it. <br /><brCommunications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-35249579238195388522009-11-10T18:21:50.741-05:002009-11-10T18:21:50.741-05:00Wow. A tag team. Not a problem. Two people that ca...Wow. A tag team. Not a problem. Two people that can't handle the English language but continue to try to make excuses for this administration. <br /><br />Ok, My first post, I copied and pasted three dates that Bush gave interviews to the NYTimes. I don't care what else the website said about Rachel Maddow. It gave three dates that refuted the bloggers claim of no interviews. <br /><br />Not Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08263978142551394876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-4310611665155052192009-11-10T17:34:16.594-05:002009-11-10T17:34:16.594-05:00Not I would take Rachel Maddow over anything you w...Not I would take Rachel Maddow over anything you would consider information source any day of the week. Again Not you just outed yourself as a liar you claim you don't watch or listen to her so how the hell would you know how valid her information is?<br /><br />That's one of the right talking points to discredit Ms.Maddow, call her a liar yet they have little to no evidence to back up Motor City Liberal Returnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05316739270707220559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-68438580918071473982009-11-10T10:27:36.255-05:002009-11-10T10:27:36.255-05:00Poor little anonymous; you just don’t get it.
He...Poor little anonymous; you just don’t get it. <br /><br />Here’s the point you continue to ignore, little anonymous. Fox “news” has ginned up another false “war” on nothing, yet more was done to MSNBC and the NY Times - real news outlets - by the Bush Administration and there was no outcry.<br /><br />The blogger - that’s me I think - said that Bush didn't grant any interviews to the NYTimes,Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-69425071236989965992009-11-10T09:32:51.752-05:002009-11-10T09:32:51.752-05:00Poor little Johnny. You just don't get it. The...Poor little Johnny. You just don't get it. The blogger said that Bush didn't grant any interviews to the NYTimes. I only put out the information that he had. My only comment about Rachel Maddow was that when you listen to her, you get poor quality information. If she corrected it, fine, but so far, you're the only one that has said so, and you're basing it on your memory. Knowing Not Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08263978142551394876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-42044987705687987872009-11-10T00:29:16.588-05:002009-11-10T00:29:16.588-05:00Not Anonymous you set up a faulty argument to defe...Not Anonymous you set up a faulty argument to defend the right wing point of view on the subject but again you overlook the larger point the post presented.<br /><br />Now you're the one that brought up Rachel Maddow and the New York Times yet you left out the parts where Maddow say she's going to correct herself and why she was lead to believe that Bush froze out the times during his Motor City Liberal Returnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05316739270707220559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-45816198591693550822009-11-09T16:58:09.052-05:002009-11-09T16:58:09.052-05:00I did my research, little anonymous. I had to dig ...I did my research, little anonymous. I had to dig up a link because most of the time you simply make up stuff out of thin air. Ever heard of the word plagiarism? You should look it up. I do question the veracity of anything you say, but because I never lie and am accountable, I corrected it. You will never se that on a rightwing blog. <br />Again, why are there no links to these alleged Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-14031702457851009702009-11-09T16:39:23.566-05:002009-11-09T16:39:23.566-05:00Little Johnny, oops. I missed one thing. You haven...Little Johnny, oops. I missed one thing. You haven't proven I've lied about anything. You make assumptions of what I believe, who I listen to, what I think, but you haven't shown even one lie that I supposedly told. After all, all I did was list three interviews that Bush did give to the NYTimes after it was said that he never did in this blogs whining about Fox News. <br /><br />As Not Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08263978142551394876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-81584293328934036672009-11-09T16:35:21.892-05:002009-11-09T16:35:21.892-05:00Little Johnny, it's simple really. I listed th...Little Johnny, it's simple really. I listed three times that Bush granted interviews. <br /><br />I didn't claim that Maddow didn't issue a correction. I don't listen to her. I don't watch her. I don't know who she is. I don't care who she is. But since your only source for saying that she corrected it, is your own memory, I have my doubts as to whether she did correctNot Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08263978142551394876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-6142126081388696122009-11-09T16:28:08.875-05:002009-11-09T16:28:08.875-05:00Imagine Comm if you had done your research before ...Imagine Comm if you had done your research before you actually typed it out. You wouldn't have had to dig up a link to prove my point. You still question the veracity of it even though you removed it from your blog. <br /><br />It's really simple. If you don't lie, you don't have to edit, after the fact, that which you have written.Not Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08263978142551394876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-29500861921058537252009-11-09T14:18:39.310-05:002009-11-09T14:18:39.310-05:00"The Rachel Maddow Show told us they were goi..."The Rachel Maddow Show told us they were going off a Los Angeles Times blog post that was based on Stolberg's comments. The blog post was incorrectly headlined, "Nine years later the N.Y. Times still awaits its Bush interview." from your own source nonetheless Not A. <br /><br />Once again Not Anonymous you provided me a chance to shit on your little right wing parade and I&#Motor City Liberal Returnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05316739270707220559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-60989333530352031552009-11-09T13:19:40.656-05:002009-11-09T13:19:40.656-05:00I never used Rachel Maddow as a source, but after ...I never used Rachel Maddow as a source, but after reading the piece you stole word for word with no link, I’m not sure she’s wrong, even though she issued an on air correction. Here’s the link to the info you ripped off word for word, anonymous. <br />http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/oct/27/rachel-maddow/president-bush-new-york-times-interviews/<br /><br />Funny, they say Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-71686133315311613742009-11-09T11:20:41.412-05:002009-11-09T11:20:41.412-05:00On June 5, 2001, New York Times reporter Frank Bru...On June 5, 2001, New York Times reporter Frank Bruni had what he described as Bush's first "one-on-one interview" since Sen. Jim Jeffords of Vermont switched parties and threw control of the Senate to the Democrats. "We're looking at a different landscape, but still on the same continent," Bush said. "The same votes. The members haven't changed." <br /><Not Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08263978142551394876noreply@blogger.com