tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post3022404989928688450..comments2023-11-03T08:09:15.690-05:00Comments on The Conservative Media: Dillon recall attempt bites the dustCommunications guruhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comBlogger25125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-45381320099145991982008-05-28T20:12:00.000-05:002008-05-28T20:12:00.000-05:00I say Drolet has made lots of claims and accusatio...I say Drolet has made lots of claims and accusations. Not a single one has been true or correct.Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-8185264616880726272008-05-28T19:53:00.000-05:002008-05-28T19:53:00.000-05:00Now what do you have to say for yourself and your ...Now what do you have to say for yourself and your party.<BR/><BR/>"Some of the signatures that the SOS believes are invalid may be the result of deliberate sabotage by paid operatives of Speaker Dillon and Michigan Democratic Party Chair Mark Brewer. On May 23rd, a woman named Julianne Cuneo testified that Dillon's and Brewer's attorney paid her to infiltrate the recall campaign. Ms. Cuneo Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-13206020132715960622008-05-27T17:09:00.000-05:002008-05-27T17:09:00.000-05:00First, there’s not much to debunk, other than some...First, there’s not much to debunk, other than some guy’s opinion. The conviction stands by itself. You can’t possibly compare the American Spectator to the mainstream media? The corporate media is conservative. A few large corporations own most of the media outlets, and you’re telling me corporations are liberal? I don’t think so. The Spectator was created to get Bill Clinton, and only the Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-71040671308799294942008-05-27T01:44:00.000-05:002008-05-27T01:44:00.000-05:00Hmm, you try to debunk an article because it's wri...Hmm, you try to debunk an article because it's written by a someone that is on the Conservative side? <BR/><BR/>You offer no sources as a way of proof to back up your assertions that the story is untrue in the American Spectator. Yet you attempt to discount it because it has a Conservative lean to it. I wonder, do you also discount stories in the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, NBC, ABC, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-14241116951359357562008-05-26T19:30:00.000-05:002008-05-26T19:30:00.000-05:00The article states facts, something you know littl...The article states facts, something you know little about comrade.<BR/><BR/>I guess if it does not come from the Clinton News Network it means nothing to you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-38360489742895186382008-05-26T17:34:00.000-05:002008-05-26T17:34:00.000-05:00The American Spectator? The American Spectator? I ...The American Spectator? The American Spectator? I almost fell out of my chair laughing at that one. There’s an unbiased source that only wants to get the truth out. There’s a good reason rightwing trust fund magnates like Richard Mellon Scaife pony up millions of dollars to fund it. <BR/><BR/>Ask the director of Media Matters about The American Spectator and Scaife. The Wilson smear goes on <BR/Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-45635855456573596212008-05-26T17:22:00.000-05:002008-05-26T17:22:00.000-05:00Sorry, you are wrong again. The only law breaking ...Sorry, you are wrong again. The only law breaking going on was by Drolet and company. If you want to talk about criminals, your side has more than its fair share of them, and they are your heroes. Just because Drolet calls the police and makes a stink doesn’t means it’s intimidation.Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-58639307594218119552008-05-26T17:14:00.000-05:002008-05-26T17:14:00.000-05:00Joe Wilson are you kidding me. He is one of the b...Joe Wilson are you kidding me. He is one of the biggest liar.<BR/><BR/>See the following;<BR/><BR/>Joe Wilson in a Bind<BR/>By Clinton W. Taylor <BR/>Published 10/31/2005 12:07:45 AM<BR/>Last week I had the privilege of being lied to personally by Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, who spoke here at Stanford last Monday. <BR/><BR/>The fact that Joe Wilson is economical with the truth probably won'tAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-79109098225070749452008-05-26T17:12:00.000-05:002008-05-26T17:12:00.000-05:00Well then CG if you feel that President Bush lied ...Well then CG if you feel that President Bush lied then sir<BR/><BR/>YOUR ARE A HUGE LIAR.<BR/><BR/>You did what Bush did.<BR/><BR/>You asked about when you lied and you did.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-56683380019778981952008-05-26T12:06:00.000-05:002008-05-26T12:06:00.000-05:00I will say it again, I didn’t know how many, don’t...I will say it again, I didn’t know how many, don’t care how many and it doesn’t matter how many convictions. Again, nice try of directing the attention from the real illegal activity. You keep making these charges of “goons,” but none of it was true. There was no intimidation from the Democrats. I can promise you that if someone tried to intimidate me from signing a recall petition I would do Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-51478629101282753582008-05-26T09:07:00.000-05:002008-05-26T09:07:00.000-05:00I actually believe that you believe you are not ly...I actually believe that you believe you are not lying. However, you do ignore the facts. It was reported on WDIV with sound and pictures that those working for Dillon were using intimidation tactics against those collecting signatures. <BR/><BR/>They were intimidating old ladies and homeowners. This was shown on the news. <BR/><BR/>Facts don't become speculation just because you don't want to Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-60907039399652202302008-05-26T07:35:00.000-05:002008-05-26T07:35:00.000-05:00CG,You are saying you did not lie because you did ...CG,<BR/><BR/>You are saying you did not lie because you did not know he was an eight time (felonies) convicted criminal. I will take you at your word for that because you say you do not tell a lie or strech the truth.<BR/><BR/>All of the worlds intelligent agencies were saying Iraq had WMD's, he killed thousands of his own people with them, all the Dem's said he had WMD's (see link above) and Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-73308735777204046172008-05-25T22:03:00.000-05:002008-05-25T22:03:00.000-05:00It’s not a lie because I had no idea of his record...It’s not a lie because I had no idea of his record, other than he was convicted of a crime and was released. How many is irrelevant. The only mistake in judgment is letting him go after people like you made the ridiculous and untrue charges of intimidation. The only wrongdoing that has taken place has been from the recall people.<BR/>I was not trying to pass anyone off as anything. There was no Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-60013381656331053602008-05-25T20:54:00.000-05:002008-05-25T20:54:00.000-05:00The lie was you stating that he was convicted once...The lie was you stating that he was convicted once not EIGHT times. One conviction even of a felony may be a huge mistake in judgement and I would give a man or women a pass on that. But EIGHT times CG you have to admit is someone who is probably not a stand up citizen and probably not someone either party should be hiring to scare or sorry I mean "inform" old people of whatever they want them Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-78483689769610037312008-05-25T18:57:00.000-05:002008-05-25T18:57:00.000-05:00That is correct. I am still waiting for you to poi...That is correct. I am still waiting for you to point out a lie. I made a mistake on the number of apparent convictions, but it is irrelevant. He is a convicted felon who has paid his debt to society. I’m not familiar with his record, and frankly it’s irrelevant. He and the Michigan Democrats Party did nothing illegal. That’s not the case with the recall group. You still have not pointed out a lieCommunications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-45118292880086243752008-05-25T17:49:00.000-05:002008-05-25T17:49:00.000-05:00CGIf you really want to get your blood boiling rea...CG<BR/><BR/>If you really want to get your blood boiling read the following quotes:<BR/><BR/>http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html<BR/><BR/>Yeah is was only Bush who said these things.<BR/><BR/>For you to be intellectually honest (oh there is that word again) you must call on all your liberal friends to demand that all of the politicians which made the statements in the above link Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-88319051719160373342008-05-25T15:27:00.000-05:002008-05-25T15:27:00.000-05:00CG, did you graduate from elementary school, I dou...CG, did you graduate from elementary school, I doubt you went to High School.<BR/><BR/>You said "I’m still waiting for you to point out a lie. Oh, I forgot, you’re an idiot. Never mind. I said he is “a person who ONCE committed A crime and paid his debt to society.” That is correct."<BR/><BR/>Let me school you, "ONCE" and "A" are singular and in the english language mean "one time".<BR/><BR/>And Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-62833556065349854162008-05-25T12:17:00.000-05:002008-05-25T12:17:00.000-05:00You want to pay semantics, fine. The MDP hired a c...You want to pay semantics, fine. The MDP hired a convicted felon. How many felonies he committed is splitting hairs, to me. I had no idea what his record was and don’t care. It is eight, I was wrong about the number. It seems to me if he is on parole then he has to do something to earn money to stay out of prison. What he did was legal. I would have done it for free, and I know many dedicated Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-2548828555554187482008-05-25T10:28:00.000-05:002008-05-25T10:28:00.000-05:00This is interesting. Marcel Mitchell was convicted...This is interesting. Marcel Mitchell was convicted EIGHT times, yet the CG says he is "a person who ONCE committed a crime and paid his debt to society." That is INCORRECT. He EIGHT times committed a crime for which he was caught, tried and convicted. Not just once. And those are just the ones he was caught at. <BR/><BR/>Another interesting aspect is that they Democrats didn't know he was a felonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-37168458263811008322008-05-24T20:22:00.000-05:002008-05-24T20:22:00.000-05:00I’m still waiting for you to point out a lie. Oh, ...I’m still waiting for you to point out a lie. Oh, I forgot, you’re an idiot. Never mind. I said he is “a person who once committed a crime and paid his debt to society.” That is correct.Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-82816627600579870762008-05-24T17:33:00.000-05:002008-05-24T17:33:00.000-05:00You wanted people to point out when you lie.Well y...You wanted people to point out when you lie.<BR/><BR/>Well you just lied. He was convicted 8 times for felonies (armed robbery, guns). How is anyone suppose to believe anything you say. Oh I forgot you are a liberal, never mind.<BR/><BR/>House speaker's foes criticize Dems for hiring felon<BR/>Organizers of bid to recall Dillon claim parolee who tells voters about legislator's record is out to Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-88750206674643483582008-05-24T13:55:00.000-05:002008-05-24T13:55:00.000-05:00Wow. I am stunned. That is absolutely the stupides...Wow. I am stunned. That is absolutely the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Where did you hear “the fix was in?” From the freaking CIA? <BR/><BR/>The Secretary of State is a very partisan Republican who has been mentioned as a possible candidate for Governor. For her to disqualify that many signatures it must have been painfully obvious they were invalid. They have not even begun to dig into Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-62413549777820170602008-05-24T11:04:00.000-05:002008-05-24T11:04:00.000-05:00I am hearing that the fix was in and some of the s...I am hearing that the fix was in and some of the signatures that were disqualified were actually good.<BR/><BR/>Apparently the convicted criminal that the Democrat party hired was found to have theartened with their lives the people involved with reviewing the signatures. Also, apparently but has not been confirmed yet but Mark Brewer Chairmen of the MI Democrat Party approved of the planAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-8757798011512389992008-05-23T18:37:00.000-05:002008-05-23T18:37:00.000-05:00That’s a pretty stupid question. Do you? If you se...That’s a pretty stupid question. Do you? If you see a lie you are more than welcome to point it out. A preliminary review – meaning a quick look – eliminated almond half the signatures. How many do you think a through review is going to disqualify? Right, a lot more. That also does not include them looking at Dillon’s challenges. It’s like election results are unofficial until the board of Communications guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15039487955952973487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35718918.post-73474858395364610242008-05-23T16:29:00.000-05:002008-05-23T16:29:00.000-05:00CG do you know the difference between truth and a ...CG do you know the difference between truth and a lie?<BR/><BR/>Your headline states "Dillon recall attempt bites the dust"<BR/><BR/>Then buried in your words are "However, a preliminary review found only 8,224 were valid and those of registered voters."<BR/><BR/>Definiton of preliminary is as follow's: something that precedes or is introductory or preparatory.<BR/><BR/>So you headline states it Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com